Skip to content

Head to head

Indonesia vs Uruguay: the digital nomad visas compared

Partially verified Last verified June 10, 2026 Reviewed by Henry van de Vorming

The short version

  • Indonesia grants a longer initial stay (12 months vs 6), and it is renewable.
  • Tax treatment differs: Indonesia — standard resident taxation; Uruguay — territorial taxation. Tax outcomes depend heavily on personal circumstances.
Side-by-side comparison of the Indonesia E33G and the Uruguay Nómada Digital permit.
Criteria Indonesia E33G Uruguay Nómada Digital permit
Minimum income / month €4,320 No fixed threshold
Income basis Salary / employment contract Savings accepted
Initial duration 1 year (better) 6 months
Renewable Yes Yes
Maximum total stay No fixed limit 1 year
Path to permanent residence Indirect (switch required) Indirect (switch required)
Path to citizenship Via permanent residence Via permanent residence
Family inclusion Yes (better) No
Working for local clients Not allowed Not allowed
Tax treatment Standard resident taxation Territorial taxation (Sistema de fuente territorial (IRPF/IRNR); optional new-resident tax holiday for those who become tax residents)
Health insurance Not required Not required
Insurance duration required — —
Application fee ≈ €337 ≈ €8 (better)
Where to apply Online Online, In country
Processing time 1 weeks 2–4 weeks

Green values mark the objectively better number in that row.

Full guide

Indonesia E33G →

Requirements, application steps, insurance and sources.

Full guide

Uruguay Nómada Digital permit →

Requirements, application steps, insurance and sources.

Don't forget insurance

Both programs have their own health-insurance rules — we match plans against each one's published requirement, with the evidence shown.

Insurance for Indonesia → Insurance for Uruguay →

Sources