Skip to content

Head to head

Latvia vs Uruguay: the digital nomad visas compared

Partially verified Last verified June 15, 2026 Reviewed by Henry van de Vorming

The short version

  • Latvia grants a longer initial stay (12 months vs 6), and it is renewable.
  • Tax treatment differs: Latvia — special tax regime; Uruguay — territorial taxation. Tax outcomes depend heavily on personal circumstances.
Side-by-side comparison of the Latvia DNV and the Uruguay Nómada Digital permit.
Criteria Latvia DNV Uruguay Nómada Digital permit
Minimum income / month €4,213 No fixed threshold
Income basis Mixed (salary, freelance or savings) Savings accepted
Initial duration 1 year (better) 6 months
Renewable Yes Yes
Maximum total stay 2 years 1 year
Path to permanent residence No Indirect (switch required)
Path to citizenship No Via permanent residence
Family inclusion Yes (better) No
Working for local clients Not allowed Not allowed
Tax treatment Special tax regime (Optional 15% PIT for OECD digital-nomad-visa holders) Territorial taxation (Sistema de fuente territorial (IRPF/IRNR); optional new-resident tax holiday for those who become tax residents)
Health insurance Required (explicit), min. €42,600 Not required
Insurance duration required Full visa period
Application fee ≈ €90 ≈ €8 (better)
Where to apply Embassy / consulate Online, In country
Processing time 2–4 weeks

Green values mark the objectively better number in that row.

Full guide

Latvia DNV →

Requirements, application steps, insurance and sources.

Full guide

Uruguay Nómada Digital permit →

Requirements, application steps, insurance and sources.

Don't forget insurance

Both programs have their own health-insurance rules — we match plans against each one's published requirement, with the evidence shown.

Sources