Skip to content

Head to head

Sri Lanka vs Uruguay: the digital nomad visas compared

Partially verified Last verified June 15, 2026 Reviewed by Henry van de Vorming

The short version

  • Sri Lanka grants a longer initial stay (12 months vs 6), and it is renewable.
  • Tax treatment differs: Sri Lanka — standard resident taxation; Uruguay — territorial taxation. Tax outcomes depend heavily on personal circumstances.
Side-by-side comparison of the Sri Lanka DNV and the Uruguay Nómada Digital permit.
Criteria Sri Lanka DNV Uruguay Nómada Digital permit
Minimum income / month €1,840 No fixed threshold
Income basis Mixed (salary, freelance or savings) Savings accepted
Initial duration 1 year (better) 6 months
Renewable Yes Yes
Maximum total stay No fixed limit 1 year
Path to permanent residence No Indirect (switch required)
Path to citizenship No Via permanent residence
Family inclusion Yes (better) No
Working for local clients Not allowed Not allowed
Tax treatment Standard resident taxation Territorial taxation (Sistema de fuente territorial (IRPF/IRNR); optional new-resident tax holiday for those who become tax residents)
Health insurance Required (explicit) Not required
Insurance duration required Full visa period
Application fee ≈ €460 ≈ €8 (better)
Where to apply In country, Online Online, In country
Processing time 1–6 weeks 2–4 weeks

Green values mark the objectively better number in that row.

Full guide

Sri Lanka DNV →

Requirements, application steps, insurance and sources.

Full guide

Uruguay Nómada Digital permit →

Requirements, application steps, insurance and sources.

Don't forget insurance

Both programs have their own health-insurance rules — we match plans against each one's published requirement, with the evidence shown.

Sources