Skip to content

Head to head

Indonesia vs Netherlands: the digital nomad visas compared

Partially verified Last verified June 10, 2026 Reviewed by Henry van de Vorming

The short version

  • Netherlands grants a longer initial stay (24 months vs 12), and it is renewable.
  • Only Netherlands offers a direct path to permanent residence on this permit.
Side-by-side comparison of the Indonesia E33G and the Netherlands DAFT.
Criteria Indonesia E33G Netherlands DAFT
Minimum income / month €4,320 No fixed threshold
Income basis Salary / employment contract Savings accepted
Initial duration 1 year 2 years (better)
Renewable Yes Yes
Maximum total stay No fixed limit No fixed limit
Path to permanent residence Indirect (switch required) Yes (better)
Path to citizenship Via permanent residence Via permanent residence
Family inclusion Yes Yes
Working for local clients Not allowed Allowed
Tax treatment Standard resident taxation Standard resident taxation (Possible 30% ruling (if eligible))
Health insurance Not required Required (explicit)
Insurance duration required — Full visa period
Application fee ≈ €337 (better) ≈ €423
Where to apply Online In country
Processing time 1 weeks —

Green values mark the objectively better number in that row.

Full guide

Indonesia E33G →

Requirements, application steps, insurance and sources.

Full guide

Netherlands DAFT →

Requirements, application steps, insurance and sources.

Don't forget insurance

Both programs have their own health-insurance rules — we match plans against each one's published requirement, with the evidence shown.

Insurance for Indonesia → Insurance for Netherlands →

Sources