Skip to content

Head to head

Netherlands vs Philippines: the digital nomad visas compared

Low confidence Last verified June 15, 2026 Reviewed by Henry van de Vorming

The short version

  • Netherlands grants a longer initial stay (24 months vs 12), and it is renewable.
  • Only Netherlands offers a direct path to permanent residence on this permit.
  • Tax treatment differs: Netherlands — standard resident taxation; Philippines — territorial taxation. Tax outcomes depend heavily on personal circumstances.
Side-by-side comparison of the Netherlands DAFT and the Philippines DNV.
Criteria Netherlands DAFT Philippines DNV
Minimum income / month No fixed threshold No fixed threshold
Income basis Savings accepted Savings accepted
Initial duration 2 years (better) 1 year
Renewable Yes Yes
Maximum total stay No fixed limit No fixed limit
Path to permanent residence Yes (better) No
Path to citizenship Via permanent residence No
Family inclusion Yes (better) No
Working for local clients Allowed Not allowed
Tax treatment Standard resident taxation (Possible 30% ruling (if eligible)) Territorial taxation
Health insurance Required (explicit) Required (explicit)
Insurance duration required Full visa period Full visa period
Application fee ≈ €423 —
Where to apply In country Embassy / consulate, Online
Processing time — —

Green values mark the objectively better number in that row.

Full guide

Netherlands DAFT →

Requirements, application steps, insurance and sources.

Full guide

Philippines DNV →

Requirements, application steps, insurance and sources.

Don't forget insurance

Both programs have their own health-insurance rules — we match plans against each one's published requirement, with the evidence shown.

Insurance for Netherlands → Insurance for Philippines →

Sources